The Uncertain Future of Noncompete Agreements
By: Jonathan Landesman and Aislinn Sroczynski
New Jersey contractors planning a large reduction in force (RIF) have long been required to implement that RIF in compliance with both the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 (Federal WARN Act) and the Millville Dallas Airmotive Plan Job Loss Notification Act (NJ WARN Act). With recent amendments to the NJ WARN Act having taken effect as of April 10, 2023, contractors should be mindful of the new differences in scope and obligations as set forth in the Federal WARN Act and the newly amended NJ WARN Act. Importantly, union contractors are unlikely to be subject to the requirements of either the Federal WARN Act or the NJ WARN Act in connection with the layoff of union laborers upon the conclusion of a particular construction project.
Covered Employers
The Federal WARN Act applies to “business enterprises” that have 100 or more employees across all business locations. A “business enterprise” may include “independent contractors and subsidiaries which are wholly or partially owned by a parent company.” Under the Federal WARN Act, a business may meet the 100-employee threshold by having either 100 full-time employees or 100 or more employees, including part-time employees, who, in the aggregate, work at least 4,000 hours per week, excluding overtime.
Under the NJ WARN Act, as amended, an employer is subject to the law’s requirements if it has at least 100 employees, irrespective of whether those employees are full-time or part-time, and without regard to hours worked.
Triggering the Notice and Other Requirements
The Federal WARN Act is triggered in the event of a plant closure or mass layoff. Under that law, a plant closing occurs where an employment site (or one or more operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, resulting in an “employment loss” for 50 or more full-time employees during a 30-day period. A mass layoff, under the federal statute, is a reduction in workforce that is not the result of a plant closure, that results in an employment loss at a single site within a 30-day period of (a) 50 or more full-time employees, provided that the affected employees constitute at least 33% of the active full-time workforce at the site; or (b) 500 or more full-time employees. Where the number of employment losses within a 30-day period falls below the above minimums, but the total number of employment losses in a rolling 90-day period reaches the threshold level, the Federal WARN Act will apply unless the employer demonstrates that the employment losses during that 90-day period result from separate and distinct actions and causes.
The NJ WARN Act differs significantly from the Federal WARN Act with respect to triggering events. As amended, the NJ WARN Act is triggered upon a layoff of at least 50 employees at or “reporting to” an “establishment.” Both full-time and part-time employees are counted towards the 50-employee threshold, and there is no consideration of what percentage the affected employees constitute of the overall workforce. Further, with the statute’s broad definition of “establishment,” layoffs at all the employer’s locations within the State will be counted towards the 50-employee threshold.
Union contractors frequently hire union laborers to perform work on a particular project and later lay off those workers en masse at the conclusion of that project. Federal regulations provide that notice under the Federal WARN Act is not required if the “layoff is the result of the completion of a particular project . . . and the affected employees were hired with the understanding that their employment was limited to the duration of the . . . project,” so long as the employees were “clearly” informed, “at the time of hire that their employment is temporary.”
While New Jersey does not have a comparable administrative regulation to 20 C.F.R. 639.5, quoted above, the definition of “establishment” in N.J.S.A. § 34:21-1 specifically excludes “a temporary construction site.” Though the term “temporary construction site” is not otherwise defined in the statute, legislative materials, or case law, the plain language of the statute combined with the requirement that an “establishment” be operated by the employer for at least three years, supports the conclusion that a layoff of union workers at the conclusion of a construction project will not subject the contractor to the NJ WARN Act’s requirements.
Employer Requirements
The Federal WARN Act requires that, at least 60 days before a plant closing or mass layoff, an employer provide written notice of the impending RIF to, most notably: (a) affected non-union employees; (b) representatives of affected union employees; (c) the designated state official in the jurisdiction; and (d) the chief elected local government official where the employment site is located. The Federal WARN Act does not mandate payment of severance or other financial benefits to affected employees.
The newly amended NJ WARN Act imposes substantially more burdensome requirements on employers. Under this statute, employers must provide written notice of an impending RIF to affected employees (along with union representatives and certain government officials) 90 days in advance thereof, a full month earlier than what is required under federal law and what was required prior to the amendment. Further, prior to the recent amendment, employers were required to provide affected employees with severance pay only as a penalty in the event of a failure to provide timely notice. Now, the amended NJ WARN Act compels employers to pay severance to all affected employees at the rate of one week’s salary for each year that the employee was employed.
Penalties
Employers who fail to fulfill their obligations under the Federal WARN Act may be liable for penalties, including up to 60 days’ back pay plus benefits for affected employees and a $500 per day civil penalty to the local government where the RIF occurred. Under the NJ WARN Act, should an employer fail to timely provide the requisite 90-day written notice to an affected employee, the employer must also pay an additional four weeks’ severance to that employee (in addition to the statutorily mandated severance pay discussed above). With the recent amendments to the NJ WARN Act expanding the number of employers subject to compliance therewith and imposing more burdensome obligations upon those employers, contractors contemplating an RIF should be sure to pay close attention to what is now required under both the Federal WARN Act and the NJ WARN Act.