Government Contracting Database
Economic Waste
Economic Waste
This doctrine holds that the government should not be permitted to require replacement under the Inspection of Construction clause where the installed product substantially complied with the specifications and its removal would result in economic waste. The Redland Co. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 736, 754 (2011); Granite Construction v. United States, 962 F.2d 998 at 1007 (Fed. Cir. 1992); Yates – Desbuild Joint Venture, 17 – 1 BCA ¶ 36870; Toombs & Co., Inc., ASBCA Nos. 34590, et., 91 – 1 BCA ¶ 23403.
Updated: July 30, 2018
Looking for additional government contracting resources?
Search Our Database
Cherylyn Harley LeBon
Chair
Meet Our Team
Government Contracting Database
Related Capabilities
Government Contracting Compliance Contract Negotiation and Formation Dispute Resolution: REAs, Claims, and Terminations Dredging Federal Construction Contracting Federal Contract Administration Protests Small Business Procurement State and Local Government ContractingUpcoming Events
News and Publications
November 5, 2026
/
Construction Dive
Dotted Line: Faster Military Construction Creates Opportunities, Risks for Contractors
October 16, 2026
U.S. Army Pushes Autonomous Capabilities Initiative Forward
July 15, 2026
The Department of War Suspends CMMC Phase II
Capabilities
Business Transactions
Commercial Litigation
Construction
Construction Contracts & Risk Management
Creditors’ Rights & Bankruptcy
False Claims Act & Whistleblowers
Family Law
Financial Services
Government Contracting
Government Law & Regulatory Affairs
Green Building
Insurance Coverage & Risk Management
Labor & Employment
Municipal Law
Non-Profit
Rail & Transportation Law
Outside General Counsel
Real Estate
Research Misconduct
Safety Compliance & OSHA Defense
Student Defense
Title IX
Trademark & Copyright Law
Trusts & Estates
Unfair Trade Practices & Consumer Protection Defense
White Collar Defense & Internal Investigations
