Follow Cohen Seglias on LinkedIn Follow Cohen Seglias on LinkedIn
Follow Cohen Seglias on Twitter Follow Cohen Seglias on Twitter
Follow Cohen Seglias on Facebook Follow Cohen Seglias on Facebook
Follow Cohen Seglias on Youtube Follow Cohen Seglias on Youtube
30 Years in Business
Learn more About Us
Browse by Last Name
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

    Government Contracting Database

    Concurrent Delay

    The determination of responsibility for delay is essential, as a contractor generally may not recover if government-caused delay is concurrent with additional delay not caused by the government, such as weather or contractor delay. As stated in Klingensmith, Inc. v. United States, 731 F.2d 805, 809 (Fed.Cir.1984):

    The general rule is that “[w]here both parties contribute to the delay neither can recover damage[s], unless there is in the proof a clear apportionment of the delay and expense attributable to each party.” Blinderman [Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States], 695 F.2d at 559 [1982], quoting Coath & Gross, Inc., v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 701, 714 – 715 (1944). Courts will deny recovery where the delays are concurrent and the contractor has not established its delay apart from that attributable to the government.

    See also Cocoa Elec. Co., ASBCA No. 33921, 91 – 1 BCA ¶ 23442

    Updated: July 30, 2018

    Looking for additional government contracting resources?

    Search Our Database

    Capabilities