Government Contracting Database
Contractor Delay
The defense of contractor delay requires a showing, by the government, that the contractor delayed the project without fault on the part of the government. Usually, arguments about the responsibility for delay involve a comparison of the as-planned to the as-built schedule and a showing that critical path items were delayed by certain actions, or inactions, by the parties. The contractor should attack the government’s assertions by providing a factual basis to demonstrate that the contractor did not cause the delay, that the delay was excusable, or that the alleged delay was not critical. A delay analysis is vital in asserting the contractor’s defense.
(See Delay)
Updated: July 24, 2018
Looking for additional government contracting resources?
Search Our Database
Cherylyn Harley LeBon
Chair
Meet Our Team
Government Contracting Database
Related Capabilities
Government Contracting Compliance Contract Negotiation and Formation Dispute Resolution: REAs, Claims, and Terminations Dredging Federal Construction Contracting Federal Contract Administration Protests Small Business Procurement State and Local Government ContractingNews and Publications
Capabilities
Business Transactions
Commercial Litigation
Construction
Construction Contracts & Risk Management
Creditors’ Rights & Bankruptcy
False Claims Act & Whistleblowers
Family Law
Financial Services
Government Contracting
Government Law & Regulatory Affairs
Green Building
Insurance Coverage & Risk Management
Labor & Employment
Media Law & Right-to-Know
Municipal Law
Non-Profit
Rail & Transportation Law
Outside General Counsel
Real Estate
Research Misconduct
Safety Compliance & OSHA Defense
Student Defense
Title IX
Trademark & Copyright Law
Trusts & Estates
Unfair Trade Practices & Consumer Protection Defense
White Collar Defense & Internal Investigations
